Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Holland v. Columbia Iron Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1956No. 8237Published

1ConcurrenceCrockett, Justice

I concur in the opinion of Judge Jones, and as a supplement thereto, set forth a further analysis of the case as it appears to me. The plaintiffs’ claim that the Columbia Iron Mining Company participated in a conspiracy to defraud them in connection with the purchase of their interests in the mining claims stems from the fact that plaintiffs received only $33,333.33 each for their respective one-fourth interests therein, whereas, A. E. Moreton, who had acted as their attorney, and who negotiated the deal for them, received $287,000 for his one-fourth interest in the same claims. The charge…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zampos v. United States Smelting, Refining and Mining Co. Anderson v. United States Smelting, Refining and Mining CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  2. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Alvarado v. TuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Morris v. Farnsworth MotelUtah Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API