Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cooney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1982No. 764PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERTZ, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the court below granting summary judgment to Appellee defendants. The trial court concluded that Appellants’ complaint was barred by res judicata. On appeal, Appellants contend that their complaint was not barred by res judicata and was timely filed within the statute of limitations. We disagree and accordingly affirm the order of the court below.

The pertinent facts are as follows. Appellants filed a complaint in equity against Appellees on November 24,1975. Therein Appellants averred therein that Appellee Township had vacated Township Road…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coggins v. CarpenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Brown v. KleinfelterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Wilson v. Central Penn Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Kendall v. Lancaster Exploration & Dev. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Cole v. FinselDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Briggs v. Southwestern Energy Production, Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API