Legal Opinion

Cary v. Armbrust

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1955No. 33706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.

This is an action for partition of real estate by Dan Cary and Cornelia S. Cary, plaintiffs and appellants, against John L. Armbrust, defendant and appellant; and Otto A. Armbrust, Helen Armbrust, Peter Hansen, Jr., and Bernice Hansen, defendants and appellees. A trial was had to the court following which a decree was entered in which it was adjudged that the plaintiffs were the owners of an undivided three-fifths interest in the land in question; that Otto A. Armbrust had an undivided one-fifth interest; and that John L. Armbrust had an undivided one-fifth interest therein. In addition to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trowbridge v. DonnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Kilgour v. CrawfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Gentry v. BurgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Oliver v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Johnson v. EmerickNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FTR Farms v. Rist FarmNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Smith v. WadeNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API