People v. Aledamat
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.
*1151Yazan Aledamat (defendant) thrust the exposed blade of a box-cutter toward a man while threatening, "I'll kill you." A jury convicted him of assault with a deadly weapon and making criminal threats. Defendant argues that the assault conviction is invalid because the trial court wrongly instructed the jury that a "deadly weapon" includes an "inherently deadly" weapon when a box cutter is not an inherently deadly weapon as a matter of law. (See People v. McCoy (1944) 25 Cal.2d 177, 188, 153 P.2d 315 ( McCoy ).) Defendant is correct. Further, because this error placed a legally invalid theory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. GuitonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ManriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. AledamatCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. Stutelberg, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Jackson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Atkins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Marsh, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.