Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 4, 1992No. 7401; 7405PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
In a recursion to this court,1 the defendants appeal, after a jury trial, from a conviction of possession of heroin in violation of General Statutes *555§ 21a-279 (a)2 and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of General Statutes § 21a-267 (a).3 They claim that (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the substance at issue was heroin, (2) their right to due process and equal protection of the laws was violated by the methodology employed by the state to test the seized material, (3) the trial court improperly refused to strike expert…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. ChetcutiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- State v. FamigliettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. ColletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. BattistaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. DesLaurierConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992