Legal Opinion

Cumberbatch v. Burnham

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 7, 2017No. 2017 NYSlipOp 50429(U)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Trevor Cumberbatch, Respondent,

against

Kenneth Burnham and Sonia Burnham, Appellants.

Kenneth Burnham and Sonia Burnham, appellants pro se.

The Hinds Law Firm, LLC, respondent pro se (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Bruce E. Scheckowitz, J.), dated September 2, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted landlord's cross motion, in effect, to amend the final judgment to include a monetary award to landlord in the sum of $6,600.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs.

In this holdover…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In Re Estate of FrutigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Nash v. Yablon-NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API