Winsor v. Bailey
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
In Equity. The bill is as follows: Nathaniel Winsor, J. W. Olmstead, Samuel G. and Gilman Tuttle, of Boston, in the county of Suffolk, and commonwealth of Massachusetts, Isaac Farrington and Joshua W. Dániels, of Lowell, in the county of Middlesex, and said commonwealth^ complain against Robert W. Bailey, Joseph W. Guernsey, George A. Guernsey, and Axel Dear-born, of said Boston, Albert G. Folsom, Samuel B. Smith, of Laconia, in our county of Belknap, the Laconia Savings…
Read the full summary
In Equity. The bill is as follows: Nathaniel Winsor, J. W. Olmstead, Samuel G. and Gilman Tuttle, of Boston, in the county of Suffolk, and commonwealth of Massachusetts, Isaac Farrington and Joshua W. Dániels, of Lowell, in the county of Middlesex, and said commonwealth^ complain against Robert W. Bailey, Joseph W. Guernsey, George A. Guernsey, and Axel Dear-born, of said Boston, Albert G. Folsom, Samuel B. Smith, of Laconia, in our county of Belknap, the Laconia Savings Bank, a corporation duly established by the laws of New Hampshire, James W. Bailey, of Gilford, in said county of Belknap,…
1Opinion of the Court
Equity — Multifariousness. 1. It appears, at least inferentially, from the bill that there are stockholders in the Hooksett Manufacturing Company who are not made parties, either plaintiff or defendant. The bill therefore seems to be defective in this particular: either the other stockholders should be joined, or it should be alleged that the proceeding is brought by the plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and others having a like interest. March v. Eastern Railroad Company, 40 N.H. 548. This defect may be cured by amendment.
2. The bill alleges that the plaintiffs are owners of stock, and sets…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Varick v. Smith & The Attorney GeneralNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Boyd & Suydam v. Hoyt & ParselNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Murray v. HayNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
- Halstead v. ShepardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- March v. Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1944