Hunter v. Mutual Reserve Life Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.
Previous to May Í8, 1899, the defendant had appointed, under the then existing law of Horth Carolina, one James R. Young as its representative or attorney for the purpose of receiving service of procesp upon defendant in that State. On May 18, 1899, this appointment was revoked and defendant formally withdrew from doing business in Horth Carolina. After that, business was done through the defendant’s Hew York office, so far as the Horth Carolina then existing policies were concerned, which business consisted merely in receiving and mailing remittances. Some four instances, however, are cited…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hunter v. Mutual Reserve Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Woodward v. . Mutual Reserve Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Birch v. Mutual Reserve Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Johnston v. Mutual Reserve Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1904