Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Halstead

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 26, 1992No. 1910076PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves a patient who sued his dentist for allegedly submitting to his insurance company a false claim, and being paid for professional services that were never furnished to the patient. In deciding one of the legal issues presented, we must determine whether, to support a fraud claim, the misrepresentation must always be made to the party defrauded, or whether a third party can sue if he can show loss or injury resulting from the misrepresentation.

FACTS

The plaintiff, James F. Thomas, went to see the defendant, Dr. Fred E. Halstead, who took several X-rays of Thomas's mouth and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Potter v. First Real Estate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Delta Health Group, Inc. v. StaffordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Wyeth, Inc. v. Danny Weeks and Vicki WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Chase v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., USADistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  5. Baxter v. I.S.T.A. Insurance TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API