Legal Opinion
Nunheimer v. Continental Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 1, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-10956-WGYPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Warren C. Nunheimer (“Nunheimer”), individually and as President of Cape-Carrier Corporation (“Cape-Carrier”), brought this action against defendants Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”), Utica Mutual Insurance Company, Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company, and Chicago Insurance Company, alleging that the defendants have denied Nunheimer insurance benefits properly due to him under policies issued by the defendants. Nunheimer further alleges that the defendants’ refusals to pay him benefits constitutes a violation of Mass. Gen.Laws ch. 93A…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Cambridge Plating Co., Inc. v. Napco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Patrick Catrone v. Thoroughbred Racing Associations of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Goldsmith v. Reliance InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schwartz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Ora Catering, Inc. v. Northland InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Mulhern v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Nurse v. Omega US Insurance, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Hawley v. Preferred Mutual Insurance Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.