Legal Opinion

Pan American Production Co. v. Hollandsworth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1956No. 10399PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• HUGHES, Justice.

This is a very difficult Rule 37 case. Such rule, of the Railroad Commission, regulates the spacing of oil and gas wells and it and other similar rules applying to particular fields provide that exceptions will be made in order to prevent waste or to prevent the , confiscation of property.

Our trouble is, as usual, with the exceptions and, as we understand the record, is limited to the necessity of the well in suit in order to prevent confiscation of property.

The parties to this appeal are appellants, Pan American Production Company and Humble Oil and Refining Company, whose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Harris v. Wood County Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lone Star Gas Company v. MurchisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Rose v. Dominguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  4. Holmes v. Delhi-Taylor Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Holmes v. Delhi-Taylor Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API