Legal Opinion
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY v. MacDonald
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 25, 1955No. 10316PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Chief Justice.
This is a Rule 37 case on appeal from final judgment rendered by the 53rd District Court of Travis County, Texas, for defendants, Railroad Commission of Texas and H. D. MacDonald. Trial was to the court without a jury. The permit to drill which appellant seeks to cancel is for H. D. MacDonald Well No. 1, W. R. Parrish 0.15 acres in Hawkins Oil Field in Wood County, Texas. The permit was granted on the recited ground of prevention of confiscation and/or waste.
The appeal is based on the following point of error:
“The trial court erred in rendering judgment for appellees…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Houston Terminal Land Co. v. WestergreenTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- Manziel v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Withers v. Republic Nat. Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pan American Production Co. v. HollandsworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Pan American Production Co. v. HollandsworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Stanley H. Rosenthal v. Railroad Commission of Texas and K-3 Resources LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Stanley H. Rosenthal v. Railroad Commission of Texas and K-3 Resources LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009