Legal Opinion

Stone v. Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

This is a proceeding to secure a declaration of the rights of the parties under a written lease of property operated as a restaurant in the City of Kingsport, Tennessee. George E. Stone and James L. Stone were the lessors in the original lease and George E. Stone, who has in the meantime acquired all interest of James L. Stone, filed the original bill seeking a declaration that the following language in the original lease was too vague, indefinite, incomplete and uncertain to constitute an enforcible option to renew: “Party of the second part shall have the right at the termination of this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Young v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. W. G. Maltby, Inc. v. Associated Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Walgreen Co. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. Bishops Gate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  2. Kroger Co. v. Chemical Securities Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. D. A. C. Uranium Co. v. BentonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956
  4. Greene v. LeeperTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Campbell v. American Limestone Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API