Legal Opinion

Lohf v. Casey

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided August 16, 1971No. Civ. A. No. C-3039PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ARRAJ, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of the defendants to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The plaintiff is the trustee in bankruptcy of Sudler, Hart & Co. (Bankrupt), a firm which was adjudicated bankrupt in 1969. The defendants are the individual members of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.

On December 30, 1970, more than a year after Sudler, Hart & Co. was adjudicated bankrupt, the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78aaa et…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. MacKenzie v. HareSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Claridge Apartments Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tucker v. in Death of GonzalesColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Gates Rubber Co. v. South Suburban Metropolitan Recreation & Park DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Lohf v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Seltzer v. General Finance Corp. (In Re Seltzer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1980
  5. Boyce v. Fleet Finance, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API