Legal Opinion

Schanzenbach v. Town of Opal, Wyoming

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2013No. 11-8093PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Roger Schanzenbach owned several properties in the Wyoming town of Opal. Intending to install mobile manufactured homes on these properties, he applied for permits with town authorities. The town council issued several building permits to Schanzenbach but shortly thereafter enacted an ordinance that included a provision banning the installation of any manufactured home that was older than 10 years at the time of the relevant permit application (the 10-Year Rule). When the permits were about to lapse and Schanzenbach requested an extension, the town council…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Texas Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. NederlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Powers v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Merrifield v. COUNTY COM'RS FOR COUNTY OF SANTA FECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Onyx Properties LLC v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Bishop v. United States ex rel. HolderDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2014
  5. Bailey v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 69 of Canadian Cnty. Okla.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API