Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 69 of Canadian Cnty. Okla.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2018No. 17-6110PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

*1179We are presented in this appeal with the following question: is a letter written by a public employee, seeking a reduced sentence for his relative, speech on a matter of public concern for the purposes of a First Amendment Garcetti/ Pickering inquiry. See Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, 126 S.Ct. 1951, 164 L.Ed.2d 689 (2006) ; Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 88 S.Ct. 1731, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). We conclude that it is. Accordingly we reverse the district court's grant of summary judgement favoring Independent School District No. 69 of Canadian County…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. White v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  2. McNellis v. Douglas County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  3. Butler v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'Rs for San Miguel Cnty.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Davis v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 512District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  5. Anderson v. Colorado Mountain News Media, Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API