Legal Opinion
Parkash v. Utilisave Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not contractually obligated to pay certain fees to the defendants pursuant to an auditing agreement dated July 8, 1994, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 21, 2001, which, among other things, denied his motion for summary judgment on his first cause of action for declaratory relief.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that issues of fact preclude the award of summary judgment to the plaintiff on his first cause of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Amusement Business Underwriters v. American International Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Curtis Properties Corp. v. Greif CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Wilmoth v. SandorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Reiner v. WenigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Breslin Realty Development Corp. v. 112 Leaseholds, L. L. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goldman v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- LoGerfo v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Old Salem Development Group, Ltd. v. Town of FishkillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003