Legal Opinion

F. & L. Manufacturing Co. v. Jomark, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 11, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, a contractor, received defendant’s merchandise to make up into dresses. It- was charged with an agreed valuation of the merchandise and was to receive a stipulated sum per dress for the finished garments. After completion seventy-eight dresses were given to a messenger hired by the plaintiff for delivery to the defendant. The boy stole the dresses. Plaintiff recovered a judgment below based on the agreed price of the seventy-eight dresses. The messenger to whom the goods were intrusted was hired the day before. He had given fictitious information as *350to his address and as to his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. MoshkowitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  2. Sturgis v. American District Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fleming v. BronfinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Fleming v. BronfinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Central School District No. 3 v. InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API