Legal Opinion

Szawlinsky v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1961No. Appeal, No. 359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Musmanno,

On December 14, 1956, Michael Szawlinsky, the plaintiff, was seriously injured when he was struck by an automobile belonging to Honey Campbell, the defendant. He brought suit against Campbell and recovered a verdict of |10,000. From the trial court’s refusal to enter judgment n.o.v. or a new trial, the defendant appealed to this Court.

The defendant argues here that the plaintiff’s verdict may not be sustained because he was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. In Metro v. Long Transportation Company, 387 Pa. 354, we affirmed the following…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metro v. Long Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Lynch v. Erie CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glass v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Lyons v. ANDREWSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Glass v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API