Legal Opinion

Beyer v. Heavy Duty Air, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 1986No. C7-86-560PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Relator has requested review of a determination that he is not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to the “serious illness” exception to disqualification. We affirm.

FACTS

After working for one month at Heavy Duty Air, Inc. as a manufacturing manager, Robert Beyer voluntarily resigned on September 27, 1985, and applied for unemployment compensation benefits. At the hearing held by a department referee to determine Beyer’s right to benefits, Beyer testified that he resigned because of long hours, because he felt the job environment was unstable,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Winkler v. Park Refuse Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Embaby v. Department of Jobs and TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Barbara Jackson, Relator v. Direct Home Health Care, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Charles Lambert Bey, Relator v. W.W. Johnson Meat Co., Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Lamont P. Mays, Relator v. Rosenbauer Motors, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Mary D. Isaacson, Relator v. The Anthem Companies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API