Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Grant v. City of Folly Beach

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 16, 2001No. 25317Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBurnett, Justice

I concur in part and dissent in part. I concur with the majority regarding Grant’s estoppel claim. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s conclusion which allows a zoning board to produce a transcript of a hearing solely at its own discretion.

In relevant part, South Carolina Code Ann. § 6-7-760 (1977) provides:

Upon the filing of such an appeal ¡from the board of adjustment], the clerk of the circuit court shall give immediate notice thereof to the secretary of the board and within thirty days from the time of such notice the board shall cause to be filed with the clerk a duly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Paschal v. State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. South Carolina Tax Commission v. Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. The Lite House, Inc. v. JC Roy Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Bennett v. Sullivan's Island Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API