Legal Opinion
People v. Sianes
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1933No. Docket No. 91PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
In an information filed by the district attorney of Orange County the defendant was charged with failing to support his minor child, alleged to have been committed as follows:
“That the said Lucas Sianes on or about the 1st day of January, 1933, at and in the County of Orange, State of California, and before the filing of this Information, did wilfully, and unlawfully omit, without any lawful excuse, to furnish necessary food and medical attendance and other remedial care for his minor child, to-wit: a child conceived, but not yet born. ’ ’
This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Chandler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BelousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ross v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Wilson v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. BelousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969