Legal Opinion
James Pendergast v. Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 20, 2012No. 09-10612PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant James Pendergast, a former wireless telephone customer of Defendants-Appellees Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Spectrum, L.P., (collectively, “Sprint”), sued Sprint on behalf of himself and a similarly situated class, alleging Sprint charged improper roaming fees for calls placed within Sprint’s coverage areas. Sprint moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (“FAA”), as provided by the Terms and Conditions of Sprint’s service contract with Pendergast.
The district court granted Sprint’s motion to compel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Pendergast v. Sprint Nextel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Dale v. Comcast Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Cruz v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ashley Walthour v. Chipio Windshield Repair, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Joyce Green v. U.S. Cash Advance IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Torrence v. Nationwide Budget FinanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- McKenzie Check Advance of Florida, LLC v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- York v. Dodgeland of Columbia, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.