Torrence v. Nationwide Budget Finance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where the arbitrator named in the arbitration agreement was no longer conducting arbitrations, the trial court erred in not appointing a substitute arbitrator pursuant to § 5 of the Federal Arbitration Act. Based upon the decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Concepcion and Italian Colors, the trial court erred in holding that the arbitration agreement was unconscionable and refusing to compel arbitration.
I. Factual and Procedural History
County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware (“County Bank”), an FDIC-insured Delaware bank, began offering short-term consumer loans to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- King v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Mercadante v. Xe Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Richard A. Berent v. CMH Homes, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Musselwhite v. CheshireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Wilner v. The Cedars of Chapel Hill, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.