Legal Opinion

People v. Bishop

Suffolk County District Court

Decided August 11, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarquette L. Floyd, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the information or in the alternative, for a bill of particulars.

Defendant is charged with leaving the scene of an accident in violation of section 600 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. The information was sworn to by Detective Donald J. Rotts who alleged, in part — “ Source of this information and grounds for its belief being an oral conversation had by your deponent with Ptl. T. Bourie, #1511, S.C.P.D. on 5/10/70 in which he stated, ‘ I responded to an accident at Rt. 25-A, Smithtown and found Thomas Sullivan has been struck by an unknown vehicle, said unknown…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JacobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. People v. . Hudson Valley Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. People v. Taylor, New York County Courts1936
  4. People v. Cooper, New York County Courts1962
  5. People v. RubinNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maldonado v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. BishopSuffolk County District Court · 1971
  3. Hennigan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hennigan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API