State v. Sharp

Codefendants, Jerry Sharp and David Dauen-hauer, were convicted of possession of- a controlled substance, LSD. Only the defendant Sharp appeals, contending the court erred in (1) failing to conduct a CrR 3.5 hearing with respect to certain statements and admissions of the defendants prior to jury selection, (2) refusing to suppress the LSD, (3) permitting cross-examination of Mr. Sharp regarding his alcohol problem, and (4) admitting certain self-serving hearsay statements. We affirm.

Pursuant to an arrest warrant for delivery of a controlled substance, Mr. Sharp was stopped by the Richland…