Legal Opinion

Dean v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1995No. WD 50172PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

When William L. Dean pleaded guilty to charges of robbery and armed criminal action on October 7, 1993, no one informed him of his constitutional rights in open court. The circuit court assumed from a written petition submitted by Dean that he understood and waived his rights. Based on his petition, the circuit court accepted his plea of guilty.

On May 2, 1994, Dean filed a motion pursuant to Rule 24.035 asking that the court’s judgment of conviction be set aside. He amended his motion on June 24, 1994, to include allegations that his plea was invalid because the court did not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Branstuder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Crowe v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Dean v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Bauer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API