Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Louisiana Licensed Professional Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 2008No. 2007-610PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOKS, Judge.

I ■! STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Julius Jeansonne was injured while engaged in the course and scope of his employment. His employer hired Sy Ar-ceneaux to provide Mr. Jeansonne with vocational rehabilitation services. Mr. Jeansonne then hired Glenn M. Hebert, another vocational rehabilitation counsel- or, to assess the rehabilitation work which had been performed thus far by Mr. Arceneaux and to identify additional work opportunities. Mr. Hebert found the rehabilitation work performed by Mr. Arceneaux below acceptable standards and dubbed it “sham rehabilitation” as that term was used…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hebert v. Louisiana Licensed Professional Vocational Rehabilitation CounselorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Glenn M. Hebert v. Louisiana Licensed Professional Vocational Rehabilitations Counselors Board of ExaminersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Hebert v. LIC. PROFESS. VOC. REHAB. COUNS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API