Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Louisiana Licensed Professional Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 2009No. 07-610PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOKS, Judge.

| , OPINION ON REMAND

In this case, Defendant, Sy Arceneaux, was hired to provide vocational rehabilitation services to an injured employee. The employee then hired Plaintiff, Glenn Hebert, to assess Mr. Arceneaux’s work, which work Hebert found to be below acceptable standards. Mr. Hebert dubbed Mr. Arceneaux’s work “sham rehabilitation” as that term was used by this Court in Maxie v. Brown Industries, 95-19 (La. App. 3 Cir. 5/31/95), 657 So.2d 443, writ denied, 95-1630 (La.10/6/95), 661 So.2d 469, to indicate putting the financial interests of the employer ahead of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. O.K. Realty Co. v. John A. Juliani, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Lee v. PenningtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Yount v. HandshoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Yaroslav Lozovyy v. Richard KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. In re Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living TrustLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Guillory v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Louisiana Crisis Assistance Center v. Marzano-LesnevichDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API