Legal Opinion
State v. Wright
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 1989No. 17057PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
The appellant, Ronald Allen Wright, conditionally entered a plea of guilty to a charge of possessing a controlled substance. His plea reserved the right to seek appellate review of an order denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. I.C.R. 11(a)(2). For reasons explained below, we affirm the order refusing to suppress the evidence.
A brief summary of the facts is as follows. After Officer Ericsson of the Idaho Falls, Idaho, police department arrested Robert Burnside on a drug-related charge in 1984, he received information from…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Martin F. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. James Frederick RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- State v. RigoulotIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. MartiniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- People v. GaldineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- State v. ParentNevada Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.