Legal Opinion
United States v. James Frederick Rowland
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1998No. 96-1512, 97-1016PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
James Rowland appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from his residence pursuant to an anticipatory search warrant. Rowland argues the warrant was invalid for lack of probable cause because the supporting affidavit failed to establish a sufficient nexus between the items to be seized and Rowland’s residence. Although we conclude the warrant was not supported by probable cause, we affirm the district court’s denial of the motion to suppress based on the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule.
BACKGROUND
In 1993, United States…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. GendronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Kenyatta Brack, Patrick Henderson, Willie Tyler, Nicholas Martinez, Maurita Stovall, and Dana RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. DanhauerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Alexander Montagu HayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. AngelosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.