Legal Opinion

Verran v. Blacklock

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1975No. Docket 20645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal from a judgment of forfeiture of the vendee’s interest under a land contract entered upon a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and from a directed verdict of no cause of action in favor of the third-party defendants. We affirm.

A verdict is properly directed only when there is no question for the trier of fact. That is, when all of the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the party against whom the verdict is sought, all reasonable men would agree that the moving party should prevail. Snider v Bob Thibodeau Ford, Inc, 42 Mich App 708, 712; 202 NW2d…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snider v. Bob Thibodeau Ford, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ingram v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Daniel v. McNamaraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MTS CO. v. Taiga Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Indiana Insurance v. ErhlichDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Holloway v. CronkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. James Allore v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API