Susan L. Ketchum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentVan Graafeiland, Circuit Judge
If I understand my colleagues’ position, it is that, to the extent the Commissioner’s disallowance of deductions from a Subchapter S corporation’s gross income moves the corporation’s taxable income from the red into the black, the amount involved should be treated as an “increase”, or actually the creation, of taxable income. That amount, my colleagues hold, can then be treated, under section 6013(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, as omitted income of the wife of the corporation’s sole shareholder. I respectfully disagree.
The existence vel non of income is not determined by bookkeeping…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Colony, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- William H. Leonhart and Martha C. Leonhart v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Uptegrove Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.