Legal Opinion

Uptegrove Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1953No. 10933_1PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a deficiency in the taxpayer’s 1944 income and excess profits tax more than three years but less than five after taxpayer had filed its 1944 return. This delay has necessitated a determination whether the normal three-year statute of limitations, Section 275(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 275(a), or the longer five-year period made applicable tQ certain deficiency claims by Section 275(c) 1 con trols this case. The Tax Court sustained the assessment as timely under Section 275(c) and the taxpayer has filed this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ewald v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. Ketcham v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. O'Bryan v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Colony, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Lawrence v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  3. United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Colony, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  5. The Colony, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API