Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Yost v. Omar Ibn El Khattab Mosque, Inc. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 2019No. 2017-1067PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
*523{¶ 1} This matter is before us as a result of a motion for reconsideration filed by the Reash/Brey1 respondents-appellants, one of the factions purporting to *524represent Omar Ibn El Khattab Mosque, Inc. ("Omar Mosque" or "the corporation"). Relator-appellee, the Ohio Attorney General,2 and respondent-appellee, the Khan/Ball faction of the corporation, each filed memorandums opposing reconsideration.
{¶ 2} The Ohio Attorney General commenced this case by filing a complaint for a writ of quo warranto in the Tenth District Court of Appeals seeking to dissolve the corporation. On December 20, 2018,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. McBrideOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Miller v. BradyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Falke v. Montgomery County Residential Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norman v. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Masjid Omar Ibn Khattab Mosque v. SalimOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Yost v. Omar Ibn El Khattab Mosque, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019