St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
The Williams-Miller Mercantile .Company filed its eom- plaint before tlie Corporation Commission, in which it alleged in substance that it had been engaged án general merchandise at Chris; ie, Okla., for a number of years, and in connection therewith have bought and sold lumber, crossties, and cordwood; that it has been paying for a lease for some four or five years oil a part of the Frisco Railway Company's right of way of $12 a year for a space of 100 leet loing and SO feist deep; that its lease will expire August 27, 1924, and that it has been notified by the railway…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bohn Lumber Products Co. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947