Legal Opinion
United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 7, 1999No. Civ.A.96-2300-GTVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VanBEBBER, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States Surgical Corporation brought this action asserting claims of trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114, unfair competition under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271, and various state law claims. Crystal Medical Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Orris, Inc. (CMT) asserted antitrust counterclaims alleging that plaintiffs conduct violates the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. The case is before the court on defendants Orris, Inc., Brett Hoskins, Paul Lovoi, Advantage Medical Products, Nancy English, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Hatfield v. Board Of County Commissioners For Converse CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Haynes International, Inc. v. Jessop Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Motorola, Inc. v. Interdigital Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Antimo, LLC v. Brendan ReichDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Antimo, LLC v. Brendan ReichDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026