Legal Opinion

Berg v. Ting

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1995No. 60928-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

125 Wn.2d 544 (1995)

886 P.2d 564

NORMAN BERG, ET AL, Respondents,

v.

ROBERT Y. TING, ET AL, Petitioners.

No. 60928-4.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 5, 1995.

Betts, Patterson & Mines, P.S., by Bruce H. Hurst, Karen J. Summerville, and Thomas F. Peterson, for petitioners.

Davis Wright Tremaine, by Stephen M. Rummage, for respondents.

BRACHTENBACH, J.

Neighboring residential property owners dispute whether a grant of easement complies with the statute of frauds, and, if not, whether the easement is nevertheless enforceable under the doctrine of part performance.

Norman and Marjorie Berg…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Kramarevcky v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API