Legal Opinion
Bic Leisure Products, Inc. v. Windsurfing International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1991No. 83 Civ. 3774 (MEL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
In this patent infringement dispute, following completion of the damages phase of a bifurcated trial BIC Leisure Products, Inc. (“BIC”) moves to modify the resulting findings of fact and conclusions of law dated April 8, 1991, 761 F.Supp. 1032, to reflect BIC’s defense of absolute intervening rights. Windsurfing International, Inc. (“Windsurfing”) opposes, arguing that BIC has waived the defense and that in any event BIC has not proven on the merits that it is entitled to intervening rights to the extent it claims.
For the reasons discussed below, BIC’s request for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Etc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating and Packing Inc., and James F. RennelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Wayne-Gossard Corporation v. Moretz Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bic Leisure Products, Inc., and Windglider Fred Ostermann, Gmbh v. Windsurfing International, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant, and James R. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Conopco, Inc. v. May Dept. Stores Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
- Bogosian v. Woloohojian Realty Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997
- BIC Leisure Products, Inc. v. Windsurfing International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994