Legal Opinion

Marjason v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1947No. 28,324PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The appellant, together with Rose Masuth, was charged by indictment with the killing of one Leo Masuth, husband of Rose Masuth, by means of poison. The charge contained the allegations that the killing was done “wilfully, purposely, and with premeditated malice.”

Rose Masuth entered a plea of guilty to second degree murder and was sentenced to prison for the term of her natural life. The appellant entered a plea of “not guilty” and went to trial. The theory of the State was that the appellant was an accessory to the commission of the act. In support of its theory, the State offered to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BuckminsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kahn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Dye v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Walls v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brady v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Willoughby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cotton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API