Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Serge Elevators Co., Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint denied.

Plaintiff seeks to invoke the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in her personal injury action. Because plaintiff presented evidence of each element of this doctrine (see Dermatossian v New York City Tr. Auth., 67 NY2d 219 [1986]), the Appellate Division erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs inability to identify in which of two service elevators she was riding is not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Newireen AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Miller v. Schindler Elevator Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Colon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Turner v. SabourinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API