Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Salt River Valley Water Users Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1944No. 10618PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, are employed in Arizona by appellee corporation, in one or another of the capacities of conducting through irrigation canals and ditches, which they also maintain, and distributing and delivering water for the irrigation of appellee’s shareholders’ otherwise unproductive lands for the production of vegetables and other agricultural products largely shipped in interstate commerce and of pumping part of the water for such irrigation. They claimed they were paid less than the minimum wage and worked more than the maximum hours required by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Blair v. Oesterlein MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Culver v. Bell & Loffland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- West Kentucky Coal Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- New Mexico Public Service Co. v. EngelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Salt River Valley Water Users Ass’n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- McComb v. Super-A Fertilizer Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.