Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Matthews
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 24, 1996No. 94CV2250PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ECONOMUS, District Judge.
The Defendants in this action, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife), Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Program (FEGLIP), and Valencia Matthews, have each filed motions for summary judgment. As those motions involve the same issue and request identical relief, through this memorandum opinion the Court will rule on all three motions.
MetLife issues an insurance policy to the United States Office of Personnel Management for life insurance coverage for eligible federal employees. Gene R. Matthews, as an employee of the Veterans…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nellie Mae Stribling v. United States of America, the Prudential Insurance Company of America and Georgia Mae StriblingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. McShanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Knowles v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Dawn Nita McMorris by Her Mother and Guardian, Novella McMorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Company v. Curtis R. Hinkel, Appellant/cross-Appellee, Anna Hinkel, a Minor, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Lincoln National Life Insurance v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Curtis R. Hinkel v. Anna HinkelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Prudential Life Insurance v. MusicDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997