Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the Defendant Ruby Tuesday’s Motions to Dismiss, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and for Summary Judgment, Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. (ECF Nos. 79, 86). The Motion to Dismiss is premised on the assertion that even when read in the broadest, most “plaintiff friendly” terms, the Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”) Complaint is long on legal conclusions and summary assertions and short on the level of factual predicate demanded by the Supreme Court’s holdings in Twombly and Iqbal1, and the case should therefore be…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- CT INSTALL AMERICA, LLC v. BORYSZEWSKIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- ELIAS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. KISSLER & CO. INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. GEISINGER HEALTHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- MIMS v. CITY OF NEW CASTLEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021