Randall v. ROLLS-ROYCE CORP.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ TWO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Sally Randall and Roña Pepmeier, each claim to have been the victims of gender discrimination while employed by Defendants, in violation of the Equal Pay Act (EPA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Defendants are all related entities engaged in the business of manufacturing turbine engines and parts and, unless there is a specific reason to differentiate among them, we will refer to them collectively throughout this entry as “Rolls-Royce.” In addition to their individual disparate treatment…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sally Randall v. Rolls-Royce CorporCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- KELLOGG v. BALL STATE UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- McCarty v. Purdue University The Trustees ofDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- RIVERS v. GOODWILL OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN INDIANA, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- Sturgill v. Schneider ElectricDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019