Legal Opinion

Haag v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 7, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Haag, the plaintiff in error, was adjudged guilty of the crime of wife desertion and sentenced to one year’s imprisonment therefor. On writ of error reversal of the judgment is sought, principally upon the ground that a sufficient legal predicate to sustain the conviction is' not to be found in the record, notwithstanding the jury’s verdict of guilty and the approval by the trial judge- of that verdict be denial of a motion for a new trial.

We think the judgment should be reversed on the authority of Council v. State, 11 Fla. 173, 149 Sou. Rep. 13, wherein this Court held that where the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Thebaut v. CanovaSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
  3. Troop v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Council v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deal v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Gant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Callaway v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Ferris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Russ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API