Legal Opinion

Bright v. Macy

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 20, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 18062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHROP, District Judge.

Since on or before August 1, 1962, the plaintiff, Robert R. Bright, has been the chief legal advisor to the Edgewood Arsenal Command Complex and its predecessor agency, the Chemical-Biological-Radiological Agency (CBR Agency), a command complex of the Department of the Army with headquarters in Edge-wood, Maryland.

In 1962 there was an Army reorganization which, inter alia, resulted in the abolishment of the Chemical Corps Materiel Command and the Chemical Corps and the establishment of the United States Army Materiel Command and The United States Munitions Command.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Anthony J. Steinkirchner v. Charles E. Wilson, Secretary of National DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Coledanchise v. MacyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Motto v. General Services Administration of the United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API