Legal Opinion

Anthony J. Steinkirchner v. Charles E. Wilson, Secretary of National Defense

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 13, 1957No. 13580PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Certain positions in the Navy Department, including appellant’s, were surveyed and downgraded under the Classification Act of 1949, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1071. Some employees who were not veterans got new positions at the old level. Appellant, who was a veteran, did not. He appeals, relying on Section 12 of the Veterans Preference Act as amended, 5 U.S. C.A. § 861. This section provides for military preference in any “reduction in personnel”. Since no such reduction occurred, this section does not apply. Cf. Cutting v. Higley, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 235 F.2d 515, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 883, 77 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cutting v. HigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Frederick J. Cutting v. Harvey v. Higley, Administrator of Veterans' AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Parks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Wagner v. HigleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. L. Hofflund v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. Bright v. MacyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API