Legal Opinion
Estate of Dermady v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2001No. 6:98-cv-06009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Beverly Dermady (“Mrs. Der-mady”) and The Estate of Edward F. Der-mady, commenced this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001. et seq. Plaintiffs allege that defendants, Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”), the Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee (“KRIP-CO”), and the Kodak Retirement Income Plan (“the Plan”), provided plaintiffs with inadequate and misleading information concerning plaintiffs’ rights and obligations under the Plan relating to the benefits to which Mrs. Dermady would be…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Hoover v. Bank of American Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Burns v. MARLEY COMPANY PENSION PLANDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Bell v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Bell v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010