Legal Opinion

Gaito v. Auman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 1984No. 8320DC500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This appeal presents a question of first impression arising out of the doctrine of implied warranty of habitability in the sale of a new dwelling. That is, whether a residential structure which is approximately four and a half years old at the time of the sale from the builder-vendor to the initial purchaser may be considered to be a “new dwelling” for implied warranty purposes. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that a residential structure may be considered “new” for warranty purposes within the maximum statute of limitations period, which is presently ten years.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Griffin v. Wheeler-Leonard & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Terlinde v. NeelySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lempke v. DagenaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Bulldog Erectors, Inc. v. Flatiron Constructors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
  4. Gaito v. AumanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API