Gaito v. Auman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This appeal presents a question of first impression arising out of the doctrine of implied warranty of habitability in the sale of a new dwelling. That is, whether a residential structure which is approximately four and a half years old at the time of the sale from the builder-vendor to the initial purchaser may be considered to be a “new dwelling” for implied warranty purposes. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that a residential structure may be considered “new” for warranty purposes within the maximum statute of limitations period, which is presently ten years.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Griffin v. Wheeler-Leonard & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Terlinde v. NeelySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Lempke v. DagenaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Bulldog Erectors, Inc. v. Flatiron Constructors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Gaito v. AumanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987